Computer-Based System Safety Essential Reading List

Here is a quick start resource guide for computer-based system safety literacy. If you work on computer-based system safety and you aren't familiar with the below case studies, you really need to read them.  (Not just safety engineers -- everyone!)

Essential Case Studies: Because those who have not read history are doomed to repeat it.
Additional Case Studies:
Recommended Supplemental Materials
Other Mishap Case Studies: (Still important, and should be read by anyone digging deep into safety. But less specifically related to computer-based system risks.)
Other Related Topics:
Resources for deeper engagement:
  • Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge on Safety Engineering (SEBoK)
  • NASA Safety library (index | Safety Guidebook)
  • NASA Real System Failure story collection by Kevin Driscoll  (Home | slides)
  • FAA System Safety Handbook (FAA)
  • USAF System Safety Handbook (USAF)
  • List of NHTSA software-related automotive recalls (Blog)
  • Safety of Work podcast (Rae & Provan) (Podcast)

Advanced Specialty Topics/Research:
    • Computer System Diversity, Independence, and Bootstrapping Safety (Lorenzo Strigini)
    • Radiation-induced upsets. (YouTube, inaccurate summary of Toyota UA findings)

    NOTE: While Wikipedia is not always an authoritative source, for these sorts of events it tends to present useful summary descriptions.

    If you think something important is missing, let me know!
    Last update 10/18/2021

    Comments

    1. Leveson, "Engineering A Safer World", PDF download from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/engineering-safer-world.

      Neumann, "Computer-Related Risks" (based on the Risks Digest archives as of 1994).

      ReplyDelete

    Post a Comment

    All comments are moderated by a human. While it is always nice to see "I like this" comments, only comments that contribute substantively to the discussion will be approved for posting.

    Popular posts from this blog

    Software Safety for Vehicle Automation Short Course

    A Reality Check on the 94 Percent Human Error Statistic for Automated Cars

    Autonomous Vehicle Testing Guidance for State & City DOTs